Who is Melissus of Samos?

Who is Melissus of Samos?

June 26, 2021 Off By Felso

Melissus of Samos or Melissus of Elea

He became one of the known names of the Elea School and was among the pre-Socratic thinkers. He was a disciple of Parmanides and Zeno of Elea. Originally from the Greek island of Samos (Sasam in Turkish) in the Aegean Sea, Melissus spent most of her life in the south of Italy as a member of the Elea School.

Greek Thinker.. He is named after the son of Ithaigenes. He was the commander-in-chief of the Samians in the war of independence against Athens. He was the enemy of Pericles.

The last representative of the Elea School.. He has no original thoughts. He repeated Parmenides.

“If creation is a delusion, it’s useless to study how the universe was created,” he says.

Walter Kranz says: ‘The first condition on which Melissos’ narrative is based is that the timeless-infinite is also spatial. Thus the real being is equated with an element in the form of Ionia. His explanation of the concept of empty space was also important for the back-tense.’

Plato (d.347) considers him to be equivalent to Parmenides. Aristotle opposes Melissos.

A summary by Simplicus has survived, with only 10 parts of his work called Being. One of his works is wrongly attributed to Aristotle (d. 322 BC).

In the fragments that have survived to the present day, it is written: “What has always been and always will be. If it were born, there must have been nothing before it was born. If there was nothing, nothing could have come into being from nothing. So, what is, exists because it did not exist, and it always existed and always existed. It will exist. It has no beginning and no end, but it is unlimited in time. If it did, it would have a beginning. Since it is, it must have begun once, and since it has an end, it must have ended once. Since it has neither begun nor ended, it has always existed and will always be. It has neither a beginning nor an end. Because it is impossible for it to have always existed, for that which does not exist completely. Since it has always existed, it must always be unlimited as it grows. If it were not for one, it would have to be limited to another. Since it is unlimited, it is one. Because if there were two, it could not be unlimited, on the contrary, two against each other. So it would have limits, so that it is infinite and unlimited, one and all the same. It can neither perish, nor be greater, nor form. it cannot change it, nor can it feel pain or suffering, because if it suffers one of these, it can no longer be alone, but on the contrary, it is necessary that what is first must perish and what is not come into being.’

Aristotle says that Pericles was defeated by Melissos in a naval battle.

W.Kranz says: ‘The repetition of the Parmenides doctrine with its straight mourning’.